{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":11,"sheets":["D1_Template","D2_Template","D3_Template","D4_Template","D5_Template","Summary","D1","D2","D3","D4","D5"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":1,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":5,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"D1_Template","index":0,"n_rows":23,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":23,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[17,2,17,4],[17,6,17,8],[32,6,34,6],[13,1,13,4],[13,5,13,8],[14,2,14,4],[14,6,14,8],[16,1,16,4],[16,5,16,8]]}
[null,"REFERRAL"]
[null,"Referral Submission Status: ","On Time"]
[null,"Agreed D1 Referral Mark:  ",null,"Ethics Sign Off: ","No","Supervisor Mark:",null,"Second Marker Mark:"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Highlight the cell that nost closely matches the submitted component (rows 6-10)"]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[null,null,"Fail","Fail","Pass: 3rd","Pass: 2.2","Pass: 2.1","Ist","Ist"]
[null,"Knowledge and Understanding\ne.g. systematic, extensive and comparative understanding of key aspects of the field of study, including coherent and detailed knowledge of the subject and critical understanding of relevant theories and concepts","Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.","Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.","Understanding of key aspects of the  field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline.","Systematic and sound understanding of field(s) of study, some evidence of critical judgement in thhe use of that knowledge","Good understanding of the field(s) of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Able to exercise critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories/concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement in the use of that knowledge.","Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement. Demonstrated exceptional ability able to go beyond what has been previously taught."]
[null,"Cognitive/Intellectual skills\ne.g. analysis and synthesis; deploying logical arguments/solutions supported by evidence; focus on topic; drawing conclusions","Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without use of any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/ missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse, synthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of ideas.","Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills, but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical and contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence. Conclusions lack relevance.","Understanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Where appropriate showing effective judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques. Where appropraite, some judgement demonstrated in the selection and application of tools and techniques","Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and synthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without guidance. An emerging  ability to use evidence to support the argument.  Valid conclusions. Where appropriate showing reasonable judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis and evaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to critically analyse the subject concepts and practices. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing conclusions. Where appropraite  good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Thoroughly logical work. High quality analysis, developed independently.. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions. Critically analyse and apply subject  concepts, principles and practices.  Where appropriate very good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Exceptional work;  Very high quality analysis, developed independently. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Highly persuasive conclusions. Critically analyse and apply a wide range of subject concepts, principles and practices. where appropraite excellent judgement demonstrated in the application of subject tools and techniques"]
[null,"Research, Enquiry and Problem Solving\ne.g. grasping, framing and/or creating appropriate questions; methods for gathering evidence; ethics and integrity; analysis of evidence; computational problem solving; communicating findings in a style appropriate for a given context and audience","Little or no evidence of research, enquiry or problem solving skills.","Limited evidence of research, enquiry and problem solving skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not yet gained the research and problem solving skills required for postgraduate study.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses. Can communicate in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment, and with limited weaknesses.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks including evaluation with minimum guidance. Demonstrates some judgement when solving the problem.  Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register appropriate for audience.","Research skills: Can successfully complete a range of research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks, including effective evaluation, with very limited external guidance. emonstrates some judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register to engage audience(s).","Research skills: Can very successfully complete a range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. emonstrates detailed judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats for diverse audiences, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment.","Impressive ability to draw on own research, and that of others, to formulate meaningful research questions and/or solutions. emonstrates sophisticated judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Exceptionally successful in a wide range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy. Can communicate findings with real professionalism, adapting style easily for given audiences."]
[null,"Professional / Transferrable Skills\ne.g. creativity; digital practices; presentation skills; ethical awareness and practice; self-­‐management; project and time management; reflective practice; ability to identify an draw on learning points from work/professional contexts; ability to recognize own strengths and weaknesses, and to take steps to improve, by identifying and choosing appropriate methods.","No evidence of graduate / professional skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Limited evidence of the graduate skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the student has not gained the skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Is largely confident and effective in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to recognise own strengths and weaknesses in relation tto  professional and practical skills, with minor areas of weakness. Identify  practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework.","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills. Identify appropriate practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining a range of complex problems. Able to take initiative in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills, and act autonomously to develop new areas of skills as necessary. Identify appropriate practices and effect principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to address core considerations –E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is professional and flexible in autonomously defining a range of complex problems. Shows insight and autonomy in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses and developing professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment. Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is exceptionally professional and flexible in autonomously defining and solving a range of complex problems. Outstanding ability to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses, showing outstanding attributes for graduate-­‐level employment.Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion"]
[null,"Scholarly Practices\ne.g. use of relevant literature; academic writing; academic honesty, referencing and citation","Little evidence of reading. Views and findings unsupported and non-­‐ authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored.","Evidence of little reading and/or of reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Academic conventions used inconsistently.","References to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently. Academic skills consistently applied.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with accuracy and assurance. Good academic skills, consistently applied.","Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently applied.","Outstanding knowledge of research-­‐informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently and professionally applied."]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[]
[null,"    Supervisor to complete above marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in blue"]
[null,"Supervisor Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[null,"     Second Marker to complete marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in green except when in agreement with supervisor"]
[null,"Ssecond Marker Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null," "]

{"sheet":"D2_Template","index":1,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[17,2,17,4],[17,6,17,8],[32,6,34,6],[13,1,13,4],[13,5,13,8],[14,2,14,4],[14,6,14,8],[16,1,16,4],[16,5,16,8]]}
[null,"REFERRAL"]
[null,"Referral Submission Status: ","On Time"]
[null,"Agreed D2 Referral Mark:  ",null,null,null,"Supervisor Mark:",null,"Second Marker Mark:"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Highlight the cell that nost closely matches the submitted component (rows 6-10)"]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[null,null,"Fail","Fail","Pass: 3rd","Pass: 2.2","Pass: 2.1","Ist","Ist"]
[null,"Knowledge and Understanding\ne.g. systematic, extensive and comparative understanding of key aspects of the field of study, including coherent and detailed knowledge of the subject and critical understanding of relevant theories and concepts","Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.","Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.","Understanding of key aspects of the  field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline.","Systematic and sound understanding of field(s) of study, some evidence of critical judgement in thhe use of that knowledge","Good understanding of the field(s) of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Able to exercise critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories/concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement in the use of that knowledge.","Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement. Demonstrated exceptional ability able to go beyond what has been previously taught."]
[null,"Cognitive/Intellectual skills\ne.g. analysis and synthesis; deploying logical arguments/solutions supported by evidence; focus on topic; drawing conclusions","Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without use of any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/ missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse, synthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of ideas.","Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills, but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical and contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence. Conclusions lack relevance.","Understanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Where appropriate showing effective judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques. Where appropraite, some judgement demonstrated in the selection and application of tools and techniques","Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and synthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without guidance. An emerging  ability to use evidence to support the argument.  Valid conclusions. Where appropriate showing reasonable judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis and evaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to critically analyse the subject concepts and practices. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing conclusions. Where appropraite  good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Thoroughly logical work. High quality analysis, developed independently.. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions. Critically analyse and apply subject  concepts, principles and practices.  Where appropriate very good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Exceptional work;  Very high quality analysis, developed independently. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Highly persuasive conclusions. Critically analyse and apply a wide range of subject concepts, principles and practices. where appropraite excellent judgement demonstrated in the application of subject tools and techniques"]
[null,"Research, Enquiry and Problem Solving\ne.g. grasping, framing and/or creating appropriate questions; methods for gathering evidence; ethics and integrity; analysis of evidence; computational problem solving; communicating findings in a style appropriate for a given context and audience","Little or no evidence of research, enquiry or problem solving skills.","Limited evidence of research, enquiry and problem solving skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not yet gained the research and problem solving skills required for postgraduate study.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses. Can communicate in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment, and with limited weaknesses.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks including evaluation with minimum guidance. Demonstrates some judgement when solving the problem.  Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register appropriate for audience.","Research skills: Can successfully complete a range of research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks, including effective evaluation, with very limited external guidance. emonstrates some judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register to engage audience(s).","Research skills: Can very successfully complete a range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. emonstrates detailed judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats for diverse audiences, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment.","Impressive ability to draw on own research, and that of others, to formulate meaningful research questions and/or solutions. emonstrates sophisticated judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Exceptionally successful in a wide range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy. Can communicate findings with real professionalism, adapting style easily for given audiences."]
[null,"Professional / Transferrable Skills\ne.g. creativity; digital practices; presentation skills; ethical awareness and practice; self-­‐management; project and time management; reflective practice; ability to identify an draw on learning points from work/professional contexts; ability to recognize own strengths and weaknesses, and to take steps to improve, by identifying and choosing appropriate methods.","No evidence of graduate / professional skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Limited evidence of the graduate skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the student has not gained the skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Is largely confident and effective in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to recognise own strengths and weaknesses in relation tto  professional and practical skills, with minor areas of weakness. Identify  practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework.","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills. Identify appropriate practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining a range of complex problems. Able to take initiative in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills, and act autonomously to develop new areas of skills as necessary. Identify appropriate practices and effect principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to address core considerations –E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is professional and flexible in autonomously defining a range of complex problems. Shows insight and autonomy in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses and developing professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment. Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is exceptionally professional and flexible in autonomously defining and solving a range of complex problems. Outstanding ability to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses, showing outstanding attributes for graduate-­‐level employment.Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion"]
[null,"Scholarly Practices\ne.g. use of relevant literature; academic writing; academic honesty, referencing and citation","Little evidence of reading. Views and findings unsupported and non-­‐ authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored.","Evidence of little reading and/or of reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Academic conventions used inconsistently.","References to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently. Academic skills consistently applied.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with accuracy and assurance. Good academic skills, consistently applied.","Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently applied.","Outstanding knowledge of research-­‐informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently and professionally applied."]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[]
[null,"    Supervisor to complete above marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in blue"]
[null,"Supervisor Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[null,"     Second Marker to complete marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in green except when in agreement with supervisor"]
[null,"Ssecond Marker Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]

{"sheet":"D3_Template","index":2,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":19,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[18,2,18,4],[18,6,18,8],[33,6,35,6],[14,1,14,4],[14,5,14,8],[15,2,15,4],[15,6,15,8],[17,1,17,4],[17,5,17,8]]}
[null,"REFERRAL"]
[null,"Referral Submission Status: ","On Time","Component Mark:",{"$f":"(C3 + 2*E3) / 3","v":0},"Supervisor Mark: (D3a)",null,"Second Marker Mark: (D3a)"]
[null,"Agreed D3a Referral Mark: ",null,"Agreed D3b Referral Mark: ",null,"(D3b)",null,"(D3b)"]
[null,"(Report)","Weighted 15% Overall"," (Artefact )","Weighted 30% Overall",null,null,null,"Highlight the cell that nost closely matches the submitted component (rows 6-11)"]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[null,null,"Fail","Fail","Pass: 3rd","Pass: 2.2","Pass: 2.1","Ist","Ist"]
[null,"Knowledge and Understanding\ne.g. systematic, extensive and comparative understanding of key aspects of the field of study, including coherent and detailed knowledge of the subject and critical understanding of relevant theories and concepts","Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.","Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.","Understanding of key aspects of the  field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline.","Systematic and sound understanding of field(s) of study, some evidence of critical judgement in thhe use of that knowledge","Good understanding of the field(s) of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Able to exercise critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories/concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement in the use of that knowledge.","Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement. Demonstrated exceptional ability able to go beyond what has been previously taught."]
[null,"Cognitive/Intellectual skills\ne.g. analysis and synthesis; deploying logical arguments/solutions supported by evidence; focus on topic; drawing conclusions","Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without use of any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/ missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse, synthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of ideas.","Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills, but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical and contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence. Conclusions lack relevance.","Understanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Where appropriate showing effective judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques. Where appropraite, some judgement demonstrated in the selection and application of tools and techniques","Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and synthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without guidance. An emerging  ability to use evidence to support the argument.  Valid conclusions. Where appropriate showing reasonable judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis and evaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to critically analyse the subject concepts and practices. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing conclusions. Where appropraite  good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Thoroughly logical work. High quality analysis, developed independently.. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions. Critically analyse and apply subject  concepts, principles and practices.  Where appropriate very good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Exceptional work;  Very high quality analysis, developed independently. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Highly persuasive conclusions. Critically analyse and apply a wide range of subject concepts, principles and practices. where appropraite excellent judgement demonstrated in the application of subject tools and techniques"]
[null,"Research, Enquiry and Problem Solving\ne.g. grasping, framing and/or creating appropriate questions; methods for gathering evidence; ethics and integrity; analysis of evidence; computational problem solving; communicating findings in a style appropriate for a given context and audience","Little or no evidence of research, enquiry or problem solving skills.","Limited evidence of research, enquiry and problem solving skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not yet gained the research and problem solving skills required for postgraduate study.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses. Can communicate in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment, and with limited weaknesses.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks including evaluation with minimum guidance. Demonstrates some judgement when solving the problem.  Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register appropriate for audience.","Research skills: Can successfully complete a range of research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks, including effective evaluation, with very limited external guidance. emonstrates some judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register to engage audience(s).","Research skills: Can very successfully complete a range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. emonstrates detailed judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats for diverse audiences, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment.","Impressive ability to draw on own research, and that of others, to formulate meaningful research questions and/or solutions. emonstrates sophisticated judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Exceptionally successful in a wide range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy. Can communicate findings with real professionalism, adapting style easily for given audiences."]
[null,"Practical skills\ne.g. application of appropriate tools and techniques to provide a solution to a well defined problem.","Does not demonstrate any or insufficient evidence of discipline-specific skills development or application. Has attempted practical tasks/processes but followed a very limited, procedural or mechanistic formula, and they contain errors, with  no independence.","Limited evidence of discipline-specific skills development or application. Has attempted practical tasks/processes but followed a limited, procedural or mechanistic formula, and they contain errors, with little or no independence.","Demonstrates evidence of developing and applying discipline-specific specialist skills. Has completed practical tasks and/or processes reasonably accurately and with a degree of independence. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy a computational artefact relevant to the subject with a degree of independence","Consistently demonstrated the development and informed application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has consistently completed practical tasks/processes mainly independently in an accurate, well-coordinated and proficient way. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy an appropriate computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates capable and effective performance/demonstration of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has performed practical tasks and/or processes autonomously, with accuracy and coordination. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy an effective computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates an accomplished and innovative application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has Autonomously completed practical tasks and/or processes with a high degreeof accuracy, coordination and proficiency. Demonstrates strong ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy  an effective, highly complex computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates an accomplished and innovative application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Autonomously completes practical tasks and/or processes with a high degreeof accuracy, coordination and proficiency. Exhibits a full range of exceptional technical, creative and/or artistic skills. Demonstrates exceptional ability to design, develop, test, integrate or deploy a highly effective complex computational artefact."]
[null,"Professional / Transferrable Skills\ne.g. creativity; digital practices; presentation skills; ethical awareness and practice; self-­‐management; project and time management; reflective practice; ability to identify an draw on learning points from work/professional contexts; ability to recognize own strengths and weaknesses, and to take steps to improve, by identifying and choosing appropriate methods.","No evidence of graduate / professional skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Limited evidence of the graduate skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the student has not gained the skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Is largely confident and effective in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to recognise own strengths and weaknesses in relation tto  professional and practical skills, with minor areas of weakness. Identify  practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework.","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills. Identify appropriate practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining a range of complex problems. Able to take initiative in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills, and act autonomously to develop new areas of skills as necessary. Identify appropriate practices and effect principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to address core considerations –E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is professional and flexible in autonomously defining a range of complex problems. Shows insight and autonomy in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses and developing professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment. Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is exceptionally professional and flexible in autonomously defining and solving a range of complex problems. Outstanding ability to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses, showing outstanding attributes for graduate-­‐level employment.Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion"]
[null,"Scholarly Practices\ne.g. use of relevant literature; academic writing; academic honesty, referencing and citation","Little evidence of reading. Views and findings unsupported and non-­‐ authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored.","Evidence of little reading and/or of reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Academic conventions used inconsistently.","References to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently. Academic skills consistently applied.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with accuracy and assurance. Good academic skills, consistently applied.","Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently applied.","Outstanding knowledge of research-­‐informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently and professionally applied."]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[]
[null,"    Supervisor to complete above marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in blue"]
[null,"Supervisor Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[null,"     Second Marker to complete marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in green except when in agreement with supervisor"]
[null,"Ssecond Marker Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]

{"sheet":"D4_Template","index":3,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[17,2,17,4],[17,6,17,8],[32,6,34,6],[13,1,13,4],[13,5,13,8],[14,2,14,4],[14,6,14,8],[16,1,16,4],[16,5,16,8]]}
[null,"REFERRAL"]
[null,"Referral Submission Status: ","On Time"]
[null,"Agreedl D4 Referral Mark:  ",null,null,null,"Supervisor Mark:",null,"Second Marker Mark:"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Highlight the cell that nost closely matches the submitted component (rows 6-11)"]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[null,null,"Fail","Fail","Pass: 3rd","Pass: 2.2","Pass: 2.1","Ist","Ist"]
[null,"Knowledge and Understanding\ne.g. systematic, extensive and comparative understanding of key aspects of the field of study, including coherent and detailed knowledge of the subject and critical understanding of relevant theories and concepts","Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.","Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.","Understanding of key aspects of the  field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline.","Systematic and sound understanding of field(s) of study, some evidence of critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Good understanding of the field(s) of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Able to exercise critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories/concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement in the use of that knowledge.","Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement. Demonstrated exceptional ability able to go beyond what has been previously taught."]
[null,"Cognitive/Intellectual skills\ne.g. analysis and synthesis; deploying logical arguments/solutions supported by evidence; focus on topic; drawing conclusions","Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without use of any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/ missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse, synthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of ideas.","Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills, but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical and contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence. Conclusions lack relevance.","Understanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Where appropriate showing effective judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques. Where appropraite, some judgement demonstrated in the selection and application of tools and techniques","Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and synthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without guidance. An emerging  ability to use evidence to support the argument.  Valid conclusions. Where appropriate showing reasonable judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis and evaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to critically analyse the subject concepts and practices. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing conclusions. Where appropraite  good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Thoroughly logical work. High quality analysis, developed independently.. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions. Critically analyse and apply subject  concepts, principles and practices.  Where appropriate very good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Exceptional work;  Very high quality analysis, developed independently. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Highly persuasive conclusions. Critically analyse and apply a wide range of subject concepts, principles and practices. where appropraite excellent judgement demonstrated in the application of subject tools and techniques"]
[null,"Research, Enquiry and Problem Solving\ne.g. grasping, framing and/or creating appropriate questions; methods for gathering evidence; ethics and integrity; analysis of evidence; computational problem solving; communicating findings in a style appropriate for a given context and audience","Little or no evidence of research, enquiry or problem solving skills.","Limited evidence of research, enquiry and problem solving skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not yet gained the research and problem solving skills required for postgraduate study.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses. Can communicate in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment, and with limited weaknesses.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks including evaluation with minimum guidance. Demonstrates some judgement when solving the problem.  Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register appropriate for audience.","Research skills: Can successfully complete a range of research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks, including effective evaluation, with very limited external guidance. emonstrates some judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register to engage audience(s).","Research skills: Can very successfully complete a range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. emonstrates detailed judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats for diverse audiences, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment.","Impressive ability to draw on own research, and that of others, to formulate meaningful research questions and/or solutions. emonstrates sophisticated judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Exceptionally successful in a wide range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy. Can communicate findings with real professionalism, adapting style easily for given audiences."]
[null,"Professional / Transferrable Skills\ne.g. creativity; digital practices; presentation skills; ethical awareness and practice; self-­‐management; project and time management; reflective practice; ability to identify an draw on learning points from work/professional contexts; ability to recognize own strengths and weaknesses, and to take steps to improve, by identifying and choosing appropriate methods.","No evidence of graduate / professional skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Limited evidence of the graduate skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the student has not gained the skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Is largely confident and effective in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to recognise own strengths and weaknesses in relation tto  professional and practical skills, with minor areas of weakness. Identify  practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework.","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills. Identify appropriate practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining a range of complex problems. Able to take initiative in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills, and act autonomously to develop new areas of skills as necessary. Identify appropriate practices and effect principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to address core considerations –E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is professional and flexible in autonomously defining a range of complex problems. Shows insight and autonomy in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses and developing professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment. Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is exceptionally professional and flexible in autonomously defining and solving a range of complex problems. Outstanding ability to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses, showing outstanding attributes for graduate-­‐level employment.Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion"]
[null,"Scholarly Practices\ne.g. use of relevant literature; academic writing; academic honesty, referencing and citation","Little evidence of reading. Views and findings unsupported and non-­‐ authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored.","Evidence of little reading and/or of reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Academic conventions used inconsistently.","References to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently. Academic skills consistently applied.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with accuracy and assurance. Good academic skills, consistently applied.","Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently applied.","Outstanding knowledge of research-­‐informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently and professionally applied."]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[]
[null,"    Supervisor to complete above marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in blue"]
[null,"Supervisor Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[null,"     Second Marker to complete marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in green except when in agreement with supervisor"]
[null,"Ssecond Marker Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]

{"sheet":"D5_Template","index":4,"n_rows":16,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":16,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[[30,6,32,6],[11,1,11,4],[12,2,12,4],[12,6,12,8],[14,1,14,4],[15,2,15,4],[15,6,15,8]]}
[null,"REFERRAL"]
[null,"Referral Submission Status: ","On Time"]
[null,"Agreed D5 Referral Mark:  ",null,"Referral Viva Attended:  ","No (Fail)","Supervisor Mark:",null,"Second Marker Mark:"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Highlight the cell that nost closely matches the submitted component (rows 6-11)"]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[null,null,"Fail","Fail","Pass: 3rd","Pass: 2.2","Pass: 2.1","Ist","Ist"]
[null,"Knowledge and Understanding\ne.g. systematic, extensive and comparative understanding of key aspects of the field of study, including coherent and detailed knowledge of the subject and critical understanding of relevant theories and concepts","Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.","Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.","Understanding of key aspects of the field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline.","Systematic and sound understanding of field(s) of study, some evidence of critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Good understanding of the field(s) of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Able to exercise critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories/concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement in the use of that knowledge.","Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement. Demonstrated exceptional ability able to go beyond what has been previously taught."]
[null,"Practical skills\ne.g. application of appropriate tools and techniques to provide a solution to a well defined problem.","Does not demonstrate any or insufficient evidence of discipline-specific skills development or application. Has attempted practical tasks/processes but followed a very limited, procedural or mechanistic formula, and they contain errors, with  no independence.","Limited evidence of discipline-specific skills development or application. Has attempted practical tasks/processes but followed a limited, procedural or mechanistic formula, and they contain errors, with little or no independence.","Demonstrates evidence of developing and applying discipline-specific specialist skills. Has completed practical tasks and/or processes accurately and with a degree of independence. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy a computational artefact relevant to the subject with a degree of independence","Consistently demonstrated the development and informed application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has consistently completed practical tasks/processes mainly independently in an accurate, well-coordinated and proficient way. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy an appropriate computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates capable and effective performance / demonstration of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has performed practical tasks and/or processes autonomously, with accuracy and coordination. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy an effective computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates an accomplished and innovative application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has Autonomously completed practical tasks and/or processes with a high degreeof accuracy, coordination and proficiency. Demonstrates strong ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy  an effective, highly complex computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates an accomplished and innovative application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Autonomously completes practical tasks and/or processes with a high degreeof accuracy, coordination and proficiency. Exhibits a full range of exceptional technical, creative and/or artistic skills. Demonstrates exceptional ability to design, develop, test, integrate or deploy a highly effective complex computational artefact."]
[null,"Research, Enquiry and Problem Solving\ne.g. grasping, framing and/or creating appropriate questions; methods for gathering evidence; ethics and integrity; analysis of evidence; computational problem solving; communicating findings in a style appropriate for a given context and audience","Little or no evidence of the required skills in any of the graduate skills identified in the programme specification at this level.","Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not yet gained the skills required for postgraduate study.","Can communicate in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment, and with limited weaknesses.","Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register appropriate for audience.","Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register to engage audience(s).","Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats, including orally, for diverse audiences, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment.","Can communicate findings with real professionalism, including orally, adapting style easily for given audiences."]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[]
[null,"    Supervisor to complete above marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in blue"]
[null,"Supervisor Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for entering industry","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[null,"     Second Marker to complete marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in green except when in agreement with supervisor"]
[null,"Ssecond Marker Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for entering industry","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]

{"sheet":"Summary","index":5,"n_rows":25,"n_cols":21,"rows_kept":25,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[12,2,12,3],[12,5,12,6],[3,10,8,16],[24,1,24,6],[26,2,28,5],[26,10,28,13],[10,2,10,5],[15,3,16,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[17,2,17,3],[18,2,18,3],[22,2,22,3],[20,2,20,3],[15,6,16,6],[20,5,22,10],[12,13,24,16],[18,5,18,6],[17,5,17,6],[13,5,13,6],[14,5,14,6],[15,11,16,11],[15,9,16,9]]}
[]
[]
[null,"University of Lancashire"]
[null,"CO3008 Honours Degree Project Marking Summary",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$error":"#VALUE!"}]
[null,"Last Name:  "]
[null,"First Name:  "]
[null,"Student ID:  "]
[null,"Supervisor ID:  "]
[null,"Second Marker ID:  "]
[]
[null,"Project Ethics Approved by Supervisor: ",{"$f":"IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D1'!E3\"), 'D1'!E3)","v":"No"}]
[]
[null,"Deliverables","Grade",null,"Weigting","Overall",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"The matrices defined in this document are derived from the HEFQ Level 6 (Final Undergraduate Level) descriptors for UK undergraduate degrees and the UK QAA Subject Benchmark Statements for Computing Courses. These outline the standards that students are expected to be able to demostrate during the completion of their course/project. Students are assessed against the following criteria:\n\nKnowledge and Understanding\nCognitive/Intellectual Skills\nResearch, Enquiry and Problem Solving\nPractical Skills\nProfessional / Transferrable Skills\nScholarly Practices",null,null,null,null,null,null,"highest uncapped"]
[{"$f":"_xlfn.LET(\n  _xlpm.main, 'D1'!C2,\n  _xlpm.ref,  IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D1'!C2\"),\"\"),\n  _xlpm.mainTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.main,\n      \"Late (capped)\",\"L\",\n      \"Late (Uncap)\",\"LU\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NS\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFM\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlpm.refTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.ref,\n      \"Uncap Referral\",\"UR\",\n      \"Late\",\"LR\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NSR\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFMR\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlfn.TEXTJOIN(\" \",TRUE, _xlpm.mainTag, _xlpm.refTag)\n)","v":""},"Proposal (D1)",{"$f":"HighestMark(\"D1\", \"C3\")","v":0},null,0.1,{"$f":"SUM(C14*E14)","v":0},null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"HighestMarkNoCap(\"D1\", \"C3\")","v":0}]
[{"$f":"_xlfn.LET(\n  _xlpm.main, 'D2'!C2,\n  _xlpm.ref,  IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D2'!C2\"),\"\"),\n  _xlpm.mainTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.main,\n      \"Late (capped)\",\"L\",\n      \"Late (Uncap)\",\"LU\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NS\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFM\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlpm.refTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.ref,\n      \"Uncap Referral\",\"UR\",\n      \"Late\",\"LR\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NSR\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFMR\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlfn.TEXTJOIN(\" \",TRUE, _xlpm.mainTag, _xlpm.refTag)\n)","v":""},"Intro, SoA, Methodology (D2)",{"$f":"HighestMark(\"D2\", \"C3\")","v":0},null,0.15,0,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"HighestMarkNoCap(\"D2\", \"C3\")","v":0}]
[{"$f":"_xlfn.LET(\n  _xlpm.main, 'D3'!C2,\n  _xlpm.ref,  IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D3'!C2\"),\"\"),\n  _xlpm.mainTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.main,\n      \"Late (capped)\",\"L\",\n      \"Late (Uncap)\",\"LU\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NS\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFM\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlpm.refTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.ref,\n      \"Uncap Referral\",\"UR\",\n      \"Late\",\"LR\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NSR\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFMR\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlfn.TEXTJOIN(\" \",TRUE, _xlpm.mainTag, _xlpm.refTag)\n)","v":""},"Design & Implementation (D3a)",{"$f":"HighestMarkNoCap(\"D3\", \"C3\")","v":0},{"$f":"HighestMark(\"D3\", \"E2\")","v":0},0.15,0,{"$f":"D16*(E16+E17)","v":0},null,null,{"$f":"IF(AND(I16<>\"\", I17<>\"\"), (I16 + 2*I17) / 3, \"\")","v":""},null,{"$f":"IF(AND(K16<>\"\", K17<>\"\"), (K16 + 2*K17) / 3, \"\")","v":""},null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"HighestMarkNoCap(\"D3\", \"E2\")","v":0}]
[{"$f":"_xlfn.LET(\n  _xlpm.main, 'D3'!C2,\n  _xlpm.ref,  IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D3'!C2\"),\"\"),\n  _xlpm.mainTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.main,\n      \"Late (capped)\",\"L\",\n      \"Late (Uncap)\",\"LU\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NS\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFM\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlpm.refTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.ref,\n      \"Uncap Referral\",\"UR\",\n      \"Late\",\"LR\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NSR\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFMR\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlfn.TEXTJOIN(\" \",TRUE, _xlpm.mainTag, _xlpm.refTag)\n)","v":""},"Artefact (D3b)",{"$f":"HighestMarkNoCap(\"D3\", \"E3\")","v":0},null,0.3,0,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"HighestMarkNoCap(\"D4\", \"C3\")","v":0}]
[{"$f":"_xlfn.LET(\n  _xlpm.main, 'D4'!C2,\n  _xlpm.ref,  IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D4'!C2\"),\"\"),\n  _xlpm.mainTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.main,\n      \"Late (capped)\",\"L\",\n      \"Late (Uncap)\",\"LU\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NS\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFM\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlpm.refTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.ref,\n      \"Uncap Referral\",\"UR\",\n      \"Late\",\"LR\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NSR\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFMR\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlfn.TEXTJOIN(\" \",TRUE, _xlpm.mainTag, _xlpm.refTag)\n)","v":""},"Evaluation & Conclusions (D4)",{"$f":"HighestMark(\"D4\", \"C3\")","v":0},null,0.2,0,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"HighestMarkNoCap(\"D5\", \"C3\")","v":0}]
[{"$f":"_xlfn.LET(\n  _xlpm.main, 'D5'!C2,\n  _xlpm.ref,  IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D5'!C2\"),\"\"),\n  _xlpm.mainTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.main,\n      \"Late (capped)\",\"L\",\n      \"Late (Uncap)\",\"LU\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NS\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFM\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlpm.refTag, _xlfn.SWITCH(_xlpm.ref,\n      \"Uncap Referral\",\"UR\",\n      \"Late\",\"LR\",\n      \"Non Submission\",\"NSR\",\n      \"Unfair Means\",\"UFMR\",\n      \"\"\n  ),\n  _xlfn.TEXTJOIN(\" \",TRUE, _xlpm.mainTag, _xlpm.refTag)\n)","v":""},"Viva/Poster (D5)",{"$f":"HighestMark(\"D5\", \"C3\")","v":0},null,0.1,0,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"SUM(U14*E14,U15*E15,U16*(E16+E17),U17*E18,U18*E19)","v":0}]
[]
[null,"Viva Exam Attended:  ",{"$f":"IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D5'!E3\"), 'D5'!E3)","v":"No (Fail)"},null,{"$f":"IF(C21=\"Fail\",\"  Student must pass viva component to pass the module\",\"\")","v":""}]
[]
[null,"Agreed Overall Mark: ",{"$f":"IF(\n   OR(\n      'D1'!C2=\"Late (Uncap)\",\n      'D2'!C2=\"Late (Uncap)\",\n      'D3'!C2=\"Late (Uncap)\",\n      'D4'!C2=\"Late (Uncap)\",\n      'D5'!C2=\"Late (Uncap)\",\n      IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D1'!C2\")=\"Uncap Referral\",FALSE),\n      IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D2'!C2\")=\"Uncap Referral\",FALSE),\n      IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D3'!C2\")=\"Uncap Referral\",FALSE),\n      IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D4'!C2\")=\"Uncap Referral\",FALSE),\n      IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D5'!C2\")=\"Uncap Referral\",FALSE)\n   ),\n   40,\n   E23\n)","v":0},null,{"$f":"SUM(F14,F15,G16,F18,F19)","v":0}]
[]
[null,{"$f":"IF(\n   OR(\n      'D1'!C2=\"Late (Uncap)\",\n      'D2'!C2=\"Late (Uncap)\",\n      'D3'!C2=\"Late (Uncap)\",\n      'D4'!C2=\"Late (Uncap)\",\n      'D5'!C2=\"Late (Uncap)\",\n      IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D1'!C2\")=\"Uncap Referral\",FALSE),\n      IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D2'!C2\")=\"Uncap Referral\",FALSE),\n      IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D3'!C2\")=\"Uncap Referral\",FALSE),\n      IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D4'!C2\")=\"Uncap Referral\",FALSE),\n      IFERROR(INDIRECT(\"'Referral - D5'!C2\")=\"Uncap Referral\",FALSE)\n   ),\n   \"Module capped overall due to uncapped referral or late work\",\n   IF(\n      AND(C23<39.5, U19>=39.5),\n      \"Student is passable if capped components are uncapped. Uncap referred and late components and the module will cap overall.\",\n      \"\"\n   )\n)","v":""}]

{"sheet":"D1","index":6,"n_rows":23,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":23,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[16,1,16,4],[13,1,13,4],[13,5,13,8],[16,5,16,8],[32,6,34,6],[14,2,14,4],[14,6,14,8],[17,2,17,4],[17,6,17,8]]}
[]
[null,"Submission Status: ","On Time"]
[null,"Agreed D1 Mark:  ",null,"Ethics Sign Off: ","No","Supervisor Mark:",0,"Second Marker Mark:",0]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Highlight the cell that nost closely matches the submitted component (rows 6-10)"]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[null,null,"Fail","Fail","Pass: 3rd","Pass: 2.2","Pass: 2.1","Ist","Ist"]
[null,"Knowledge and Understanding\ne.g. systematic, extensive and comparative understanding of key aspects of the field of study, including coherent and detailed knowledge of the subject and critical understanding of relevant theories and concepts","Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.","Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.","Understanding of key aspects of the  field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline.","Systematic and sound understanding of field(s) of study, some evidence of critical judgement in thhe use of that knowledge","Good understanding of the field(s) of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Able to exercise critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories/concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement in the use of that knowledge.","Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement. Demonstrated exceptional ability able to go beyond what has been previously taught."]
[null,"Cognitive/Intellectual skills\ne.g. analysis and synthesis; deploying logical arguments/solutions supported by evidence; focus on topic; drawing conclusions","Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without use of any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/ missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse, synthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of ideas.","Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills, but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical and contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence. Conclusions lack relevance.","Understanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Where appropriate showing effective judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques. Where appropraite, some judgement demonstrated in the selection and application of tools and techniques","Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and synthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without guidance. An emerging  ability to use evidence to support the argument.  Valid conclusions. Where appropriate showing reasonable judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis and evaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to critically analyse the subject concepts and practices. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing conclusions. Where appropraite  good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Thoroughly logical work. High quality analysis, developed independently.. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions. Critically analyse and apply subject  concepts, principles and practices.  Where appropriate very good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Exceptional work;  Very high quality analysis, developed independently. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Highly persuasive conclusions. Critically analyse and apply a wide range of subject concepts, principles and practices. where appropraite excellent judgement demonstrated in the application of subject tools and techniques"]
[null,"Research, Enquiry and Problem Solving\ne.g. grasping, framing and/or creating appropriate questions; methods for gathering evidence; ethics and integrity; analysis of evidence; computational problem solving; communicating findings in a style appropriate for a given context and audience","Little or no evidence of research, enquiry or problem solving skills.","Limited evidence of research, enquiry and problem solving skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not yet gained the research and problem solving skills required for postgraduate study.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses. Can communicate in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment, and with limited weaknesses.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks including evaluation with minimum guidance. Demonstrates some judgement when solving the problem.  Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register appropriate for audience.","Research skills: Can successfully complete a range of research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks, including effective evaluation, with very limited external guidance. emonstrates some judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register to engage audience(s).","Research skills: Can very successfully complete a range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. emonstrates detailed judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats for diverse audiences, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment.","Impressive ability to draw on own research, and that of others, to formulate meaningful research questions and/or solutions. emonstrates sophisticated judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Exceptionally successful in a wide range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy. Can communicate findings with real professionalism, adapting style easily for given audiences."]
[null,"Professional / Transferrable Skills\ne.g. creativity; digital practices; presentation skills; ethical awareness and practice; self-­‐management; project and time management; reflective practice; ability to identify an draw on learning points from work/professional contexts; ability to recognize own strengths and weaknesses, and to take steps to improve, by identifying and choosing appropriate methods.","No evidence of graduate / professional skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Limited evidence of the graduate skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the student has not gained the skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Is largely confident and effective in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to recognise own strengths and weaknesses in relation tto  professional and practical skills, with minor areas of weakness. Identify  practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework.","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills. Identify appropriate practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining a range of complex problems. Able to take initiative in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills, and act autonomously to develop new areas of skills as necessary. Identify appropriate practices and effect principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to address core considerations –E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is professional and flexible in autonomously defining a range of complex problems. Shows insight and autonomy in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses and developing professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment. Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is exceptionally professional and flexible in autonomously defining and solving a range of complex problems. Outstanding ability to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses, showing outstanding attributes for graduate-­‐level employment.Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion"]
[null,"Scholarly Practices\ne.g. use of relevant literature; academic writing; academic honesty, referencing and citation","Little evidence of reading. Views and findings unsupported and non-­‐ authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored.","Evidence of little reading and/or of reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Academic conventions used inconsistently.","References to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently. Academic skills consistently applied.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with accuracy and assurance. Good academic skills, consistently applied.","Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently applied.","Outstanding knowledge of research-­‐informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently and professionally applied."]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[]
[null,"    Supervisor to complete above marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in blue"]
[null,"Supervisor Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[null,"     Second Marker to complete marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in green except when in agreement with supervisor"]
[null,"Ssecond Marker Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null," "]

{"sheet":"D2","index":7,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[32,6,34,6],[17,2,17,4],[17,6,17,8],[13,1,13,4],[13,5,13,8],[16,1,16,4],[16,5,16,8],[14,2,14,4],[14,6,14,8]]}
[]
[null,"Submission Status: ","On Time"]
[null,"Agreed D2 Mark:  ",null,null,null,"Supervisor Mark:",0,"Second Marker Mark:",0]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Highlight the cell that nost closely matches the submitted component (rows 6-10)"]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[null,null,"Fail","Fail","Pass: 3rd","Pass: 2.2","Pass: 2.1","Ist","Ist"]
[null,"Knowledge and Understanding\ne.g. systematic, extensive and comparative understanding of key aspects of the field of study, including coherent and detailed knowledge of the subject and critical understanding of relevant theories and concepts","Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.","Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.","Understanding of key aspects of the  field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline.","Systematic and sound understanding of field(s) of study, some evidence of critical judgement in thhe use of that knowledge","Good understanding of the field(s) of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Able to exercise critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories/concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement in the use of that knowledge.","Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement. Demonstrated exceptional ability able to go beyond what has been previously taught."]
[null,"Cognitive/Intellectual skills\ne.g. analysis and synthesis; deploying logical arguments/solutions supported by evidence; focus on topic; drawing conclusions","Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without use of any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/ missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse, synthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of ideas.","Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills, but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical and contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence. Conclusions lack relevance.","Understanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Where appropriate showing effective judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques. Where appropraite, some judgement demonstrated in the selection and application of tools and techniques","Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and synthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without guidance. An emerging  ability to use evidence to support the argument.  Valid conclusions. Where appropriate showing reasonable judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis and evaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to critically analyse the subject concepts and practices. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing conclusions. Where appropraite  good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Thoroughly logical work. High quality analysis, developed independently.. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions. Critically analyse and apply subject  concepts, principles and practices.  Where appropriate very good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Exceptional work;  Very high quality analysis, developed independently. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Highly persuasive conclusions. Critically analyse and apply a wide range of subject concepts, principles and practices. where appropraite excellent judgement demonstrated in the application of subject tools and techniques"]
[null,"Research, Enquiry and Problem Solving\ne.g. grasping, framing and/or creating appropriate questions; methods for gathering evidence; ethics and integrity; analysis of evidence; computational problem solving; communicating findings in a style appropriate for a given context and audience","Little or no evidence of research, enquiry or problem solving skills.","Limited evidence of research, enquiry and problem solving skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not yet gained the research and problem solving skills required for postgraduate study.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses. Can communicate in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment, and with limited weaknesses.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks including evaluation with minimum guidance. Demonstrates some judgement when solving the problem.  Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register appropriate for audience.","Research skills: Can successfully complete a range of research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks, including effective evaluation, with very limited external guidance. emonstrates some judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register to engage audience(s).","Research skills: Can very successfully complete a range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. emonstrates detailed judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats for diverse audiences, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment.","Impressive ability to draw on own research, and that of others, to formulate meaningful research questions and/or solutions. emonstrates sophisticated judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Exceptionally successful in a wide range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy. Can communicate findings with real professionalism, adapting style easily for given audiences."]
[null,"Professional / Transferrable Skills\ne.g. creativity; digital practices; presentation skills; ethical awareness and practice; self-­‐management; project and time management; reflective practice; ability to identify an draw on learning points from work/professional contexts; ability to recognize own strengths and weaknesses, and to take steps to improve, by identifying and choosing appropriate methods.","No evidence of graduate / professional skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Limited evidence of the graduate skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the student has not gained the skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Is largely confident and effective in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to recognise own strengths and weaknesses in relation tto  professional and practical skills, with minor areas of weakness. Identify  practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework.","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills. Identify appropriate practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining a range of complex problems. Able to take initiative in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills, and act autonomously to develop new areas of skills as necessary. Identify appropriate practices and effect principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to address core considerations –E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is professional and flexible in autonomously defining a range of complex problems. Shows insight and autonomy in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses and developing professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment. Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is exceptionally professional and flexible in autonomously defining and solving a range of complex problems. Outstanding ability to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses, showing outstanding attributes for graduate-­‐level employment.Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion"]
[null,"Scholarly Practices\ne.g. use of relevant literature; academic writing; academic honesty, referencing and citation","Little evidence of reading. Views and findings unsupported and non-­‐ authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored.","Evidence of little reading and/or of reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Academic conventions used inconsistently.","References to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently. Academic skills consistently applied.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with accuracy and assurance. Good academic skills, consistently applied.","Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently applied.","Outstanding knowledge of research-­‐informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently and professionally applied."]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[]
[null,"    Supervisor to complete above marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in blue"]
[null,"Supervisor Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[null,"     Second Marker to complete marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in green except when in agreement with supervisor"]
[null,"Ssecond Marker Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]

{"sheet":"D3","index":8,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":19,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[14,1,14,4],[14,5,14,8],[15,2,15,4],[15,6,15,8],[33,6,35,6],[18,2,18,4],[18,6,18,8],[17,1,17,4],[17,5,17,8]]}
[null,null,null,null,"Overall D3 Mark"]
[null,"Submission Status: ","On Time",null,{"$f":"(C3 + 2*E3) / 3","v":0},"Supervisor Mark: (D3a)",0,"Second Marker Mark: (D3a)",0]
[null,"Agreed D3a Mark: ",null,"Agreed D3b Mark: ",null,"(D3b)",0,"(D3b)",0]
[null,"(Report)","Weighted 15% Overall","             (Artefact - 30% Overall: Markers to wait until competion on D5 before confiming)",null,null,null,null,"Highlight the cell that nost closely matches the submitted component (rows 6-11)"]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[null,null,"Fail","Fail","Pass: 3rd","Pass: 2.2","Pass: 2.1","Ist","Ist"]
[null,"Knowledge and Understanding\ne.g. systematic, extensive and comparative understanding of key aspects of the field of study, including coherent and detailed knowledge of the subject and critical understanding of relevant theories and concepts","Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.","Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.","Understanding of key aspects of the  field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline.","Systematic and sound understanding of field(s) of study, some evidence of critical judgement in thhe use of that knowledge","Good understanding of the field(s) of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Able to exercise critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories/concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement in the use of that knowledge.","Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement. Demonstrated exceptional ability able to go beyond what has been previously taught."]
[null,"Cognitive/Intellectual skills\ne.g. analysis and synthesis; deploying logical arguments/solutions supported by evidence; focus on topic; drawing conclusions","Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without use of any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/ missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse, synthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of ideas.","Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills, but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical and contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence. Conclusions lack relevance.","Understanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Where appropriate showing effective judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques. Where appropraite, some judgement demonstrated in the selection and application of tools and techniques","Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and synthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without guidance. An emerging  ability to use evidence to support the argument.  Valid conclusions. Where appropriate showing reasonable judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis and evaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to critically analyse the subject concepts and practices. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing conclusions. Where appropraite  good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Thoroughly logical work. High quality analysis, developed independently.. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions. Critically analyse and apply subject  concepts, principles and practices.  Where appropriate very good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Exceptional work;  Very high quality analysis, developed independently. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Highly persuasive conclusions. Critically analyse and apply a wide range of subject concepts, principles and practices. where appropraite excellent judgement demonstrated in the application of subject tools and techniques"]
[null,"Research, Enquiry and Problem Solving\ne.g. grasping, framing and/or creating appropriate questions; methods for gathering evidence; ethics and integrity; analysis of evidence; computational problem solving; communicating findings in a style appropriate for a given context and audience","Little or no evidence of research, enquiry or problem solving skills.","Limited evidence of research, enquiry and problem solving skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not yet gained the research and problem solving skills required for postgraduate study.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses. Can communicate in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment, and with limited weaknesses.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks including evaluation with minimum guidance. Demonstrates some judgement when solving the problem.  Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register appropriate for audience.","Research skills: Can successfully complete a range of research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks, including effective evaluation, with very limited external guidance. emonstrates some judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register to engage audience(s).","Research skills: Can very successfully complete a range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. emonstrates detailed judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats for diverse audiences, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment.","Impressive ability to draw on own research, and that of others, to formulate meaningful research questions and/or solutions. emonstrates sophisticated judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Exceptionally successful in a wide range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy. Can communicate findings with real professionalism, adapting style easily for given audiences."]
[null,"Practical skills\ne.g. application of appropriate tools and techniques to provide a solution to a well defined problem.","Does not demonstrate any or insufficient evidence of discipline-specific skills development or application. Has attempted practical tasks/processes but followed a very limited, procedural or mechanistic formula, and they contain errors, with  no independence.","Limited evidence of discipline-specific skills development or application. Has attempted practical tasks/processes but followed a limited, procedural or mechanistic formula, and they contain errors, with little or no independence.","Demonstrates evidence of developing and applying discipline-specific specialist skills. Has completed practical tasks and/or processes reasonably accurately and with a degree of independence. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy a computational artefact relevant to the subject with a degree of independence","Consistently demonstrated the development and informed application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has consistently completed practical tasks/processes mainly independently in an accurate, well-coordinated and proficient way. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy an appropriate computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates capable and effective performance/demonstration of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has performed practical tasks and/or processes autonomously, with accuracy and coordination. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy an effective computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates an accomplished and innovative application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has Autonomously completed practical tasks and/or processes with a high degreeof accuracy, coordination and proficiency. Demonstrates strong ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy  an effective, highly complex computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates an accomplished and innovative application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Autonomously completes practical tasks and/or processes with a high degreeof accuracy, coordination and proficiency. Exhibits a full range of exceptional technical, creative and/or artistic skills. Demonstrates exceptional ability to design, develop, test, integrate or deploy a highly effective complex computational artefact."]
[null,"Professional / Transferrable Skills\ne.g. creativity; digital practices; presentation skills; ethical awareness and practice; self-­‐management; project and time management; reflective practice; ability to identify an draw on learning points from work/professional contexts; ability to recognize own strengths and weaknesses, and to take steps to improve, by identifying and choosing appropriate methods.","No evidence of graduate / professional skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Limited evidence of the graduate skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the student has not gained the skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Is largely confident and effective in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to recognise own strengths and weaknesses in relation tto  professional and practical skills, with minor areas of weakness. Identify  practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework.","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills. Identify appropriate practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining a range of complex problems. Able to take initiative in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills, and act autonomously to develop new areas of skills as necessary. Identify appropriate practices and effect principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to address core considerations –E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is professional and flexible in autonomously defining a range of complex problems. Shows insight and autonomy in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses and developing professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment. Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is exceptionally professional and flexible in autonomously defining and solving a range of complex problems. Outstanding ability to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses, showing outstanding attributes for graduate-­‐level employment.Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion"]
[null,"Scholarly Practices\ne.g. use of relevant literature; academic writing; academic honesty, referencing and citation","Little evidence of reading. Views and findings unsupported and non-­‐ authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored.","Evidence of little reading and/or of reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Academic conventions used inconsistently.","References to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently. Academic skills consistently applied.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with accuracy and assurance. Good academic skills, consistently applied.","Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently applied.","Outstanding knowledge of research-­‐informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently and professionally applied."]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[]
[null,"    Supervisor to complete above marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in blue"]
[null,"Supervisor Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[null,"     Second Marker to complete marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in green except when in agreement with supervisor"]
[null,"Ssecond Marker Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]

{"sheet":"D4","index":9,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[13,1,13,4],[13,5,13,8],[14,2,14,4],[14,6,14,8],[32,6,34,6],[17,2,17,4],[17,6,17,8],[16,1,16,4],[16,5,16,8]]}
[]
[null,"Submission Status: ","On Time"]
[null,"Agreed D4 Mark:  ",null,null,null,"Supervisor Mark:",0,"Second Marker Mark:",0]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Highlight the cell that nost closely matches the submitted component (rows 6-11)"]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[null,null,"Fail","Fail","Pass: 3rd","Pass: 2.2","Pass: 2.1","Ist","Ist"]
[null,"Knowledge and Understanding\ne.g. systematic, extensive and comparative understanding of key aspects of the field of study, including coherent and detailed knowledge of the subject and critical understanding of relevant theories and concepts","Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.","Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.","Understanding of key aspects of the  field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline.","Systematic and sound understanding of field(s) of study, some evidence of critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Good understanding of the field(s) of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Able to exercise critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories/concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement in the use of that knowledge.","Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement. Demonstrated exceptional ability able to go beyond what has been previously taught."]
[null,"Cognitive/Intellectual skills\ne.g. analysis and synthesis; deploying logical arguments/solutions supported by evidence; focus on topic; drawing conclusions","Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without use of any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/ missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse, synthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of ideas.","Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills, but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical and contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence. Conclusions lack relevance.","Understanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Where appropriate showing effective judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques. Where appropraite, some judgement demonstrated in the selection and application of tools and techniques","Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and synthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without guidance. An emerging  ability to use evidence to support the argument.  Valid conclusions. Where appropriate showing reasonable judgement and adaptability in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis and evaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to critically analyse the subject concepts and practices. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing conclusions. Where appropraite  good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Thoroughly logical work. High quality analysis, developed independently.. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions. Critically analyse and apply subject  concepts, principles and practices.  Where appropriate very good judgement and adaptability demonstrated in the selection and use of tools and techniques","Exceptional work;  Very high quality analysis, developed independently. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Highly persuasive conclusions. Critically analyse and apply a wide range of subject concepts, principles and practices. where appropraite excellent judgement demonstrated in the application of subject tools and techniques"]
[null,"Research, Enquiry and Problem Solving\ne.g. grasping, framing and/or creating appropriate questions; methods for gathering evidence; ethics and integrity; analysis of evidence; computational problem solving; communicating findings in a style appropriate for a given context and audience","Little or no evidence of research, enquiry or problem solving skills.","Limited evidence of research, enquiry and problem solving skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not yet gained the research and problem solving skills required for postgraduate study.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses. Can communicate in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment, and with limited weaknesses.","Research/problem solving skills: Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks including evaluation with minimum guidance. Demonstrates some judgement when solving the problem.  Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register appropriate for audience.","Research skills: Can successfully complete a range of research, enquiry and/or problem solving tasks, including effective evaluation, with very limited external guidance. emonstrates some judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register to engage audience(s).","Research skills: Can very successfully complete a range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. emonstrates detailed judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats for diverse audiences, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment.","Impressive ability to draw on own research, and that of others, to formulate meaningful research questions and/or solutions. emonstrates sophisticated judgement and criticality when solving the problem.  Exceptionally successful in a wide range of research and/or problem solving tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy. Can communicate findings with real professionalism, adapting style easily for given audiences."]
[null,"Professional / Transferrable Skills\ne.g. creativity; digital practices; presentation skills; ethical awareness and practice; self-­‐management; project and time management; reflective practice; ability to identify an draw on learning points from work/professional contexts; ability to recognize own strengths and weaknesses, and to take steps to improve, by identifying and choosing appropriate methods.","No evidence of graduate / professional skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Limited evidence of the graduate skills. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the student has not gained the skills necessary for graduate level employment.","Is largely confident and effective in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to recognise own strengths and weaknesses in relation tto  professional and practical skills, with minor areas of weakness. Identify  practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework.","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining complex problems. Able to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills. Identify appropriate practices and perform work within a professional, legal and ethical framework E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is confident and flexible in identifying and defining a range of complex problems. Able to take initiative in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses in relation to  professional and practical skills, and act autonomously to develop new areas of skills as necessary. Identify appropriate practices and effect principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to address core considerations –E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is professional and flexible in autonomously defining a range of complex problems. Shows insight and autonomy in evaluating own strengths and weaknesses and developing professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment. Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion","Is exceptionally professional and flexible in autonomously defining and solving a range of complex problems. Outstanding ability to evaluate own strengths and weaknesses, showing outstanding attributes for graduate-­‐level employment.Identify best-of-kind practices and effect highly principled solutions within a professional, legal and ethical framework to consistently address a wide breadth of relevant considerations E.g. security, equality, diversity and inclusion"]
[null,"Scholarly Practices\ne.g. use of relevant literature; academic writing; academic honesty, referencing and citation","Little evidence of reading. Views and findings unsupported and non-­‐ authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored.","Evidence of little reading and/or of reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Academic conventions used inconsistently.","References to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently. Academic skills consistently applied.","Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-­‐ informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with accuracy and assurance. Good academic skills, consistently applied.","Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently applied.","Outstanding knowledge of research-­‐informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-­‐level academic skills consistently and professionally applied."]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[]
[null,"    Supervisor to complete above marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in blue"]
[null,"Supervisor Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[null,"     Second Marker to complete marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in green except when in agreement with supervisor"]
[null,"Ssecond Marker Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for next submission","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]

{"sheet":"D5","index":10,"n_rows":16,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":16,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[11,1,11,4],[14,1,14,4],[12,2,12,4],[12,6,12,8],[30,6,32,6],[15,2,15,4],[15,6,15,8]]}
[]
[null,"Submission Status: ","On Time"]
[null,"Agreed D5 Mark:  ",null,"Viva Exam Attended:  ","No (Fail)","Supervisor Mark:",0,"Second Marker Mark:",0]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Highlight the cell that nost closely matches the submitted component (rows 6-11)"]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[null,null,"Fail","Fail","Pass: 3rd","Pass: 2.2","Pass: 2.1","Ist","Ist"]
[null,"Knowledge and Understanding\ne.g. systematic, extensive and comparative understanding of key aspects of the field of study, including coherent and detailed knowledge of the subject and critical understanding of relevant theories and concepts","Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.","Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.","Understanding of key aspects of the field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline.","Systematic and sound understanding of field(s) of study, some evidence of critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Good understanding of the field(s) of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Able to exercise critical judgement in the use of that knowledge","Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories/concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement in the use of that knowledge.","Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. Able to exercise insightful and critical judgement. Demonstrated exceptional ability able to go beyond what has been previously taught."]
[null,"Practical skills\ne.g. application of appropriate tools and techniques to provide a solution to a well defined problem.","Does not demonstrate any or insufficient evidence of discipline-specific skills development or application. Has attempted practical tasks/processes but followed a very limited, procedural or mechanistic formula, and they contain errors, with  no independence.","Limited evidence of discipline-specific skills development or application. Has attempted practical tasks/processes but followed a limited, procedural or mechanistic formula, and they contain errors, with little or no independence.","Demonstrates evidence of developing and applying discipline-specific specialist skills. Has completed practical tasks and/or processes accurately and with a degree of independence. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy a computational artefact relevant to the subject with a degree of independence","Consistently demonstrated the development and informed application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has consistently completed practical tasks/processes mainly independently in an accurate, well-coordinated and proficient way. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy an appropriate computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates capable and effective performance / demonstration of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has performed practical tasks and/or processes autonomously, with accuracy and coordination. Demonstrates ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy an effective computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates an accomplished and innovative application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Has Autonomously completed practical tasks and/or processes with a high degreeof accuracy, coordination and proficiency. Demonstrates strong ability to design, develop, integrate or deploy  an effective, highly complex computational artefact relevant to the subject area","Demonstrates an accomplished and innovative application of discipline-specific specialist skills. Autonomously completes practical tasks and/or processes with a high degreeof accuracy, coordination and proficiency. Exhibits a full range of exceptional technical, creative and/or artistic skills. Demonstrates exceptional ability to design, develop, test, integrate or deploy a highly effective complex computational artefact."]
[null,"Research, Enquiry and Problem Solving\ne.g. grasping, framing and/or creating appropriate questions; methods for gathering evidence; ethics and integrity; analysis of evidence; computational problem solving; communicating findings in a style appropriate for a given context and audience","Little or no evidence of the required skills in any of the graduate skills identified in the programme specification at this level.","Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not yet gained the skills required for postgraduate study.","Can communicate in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment, and with limited weaknesses.","Can communicate effectively in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register appropriate for audience.","Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment. Adopts style and register to engage audience(s).","Can communicate professionally and confidently in a range of formats, including orally, for diverse audiences, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-­‐level employment.","Can communicate findings with real professionalism, including orally, adapting style easily for given audiences."]
[null,"Marks","0-­‐10","25-­‐35","42-­‐48","52-­‐58","62-­‐68","74-­‐80","87-­‐100"]
[]
[null,"    Supervisor to complete above marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in blue"]
[null,"Supervisor Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for entering industry","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]
[]
[null,"     Second Marker to complete marking matrix by highlighting appropriate cells in green except when in agreement with supervisor"]
[null,"Ssecond Marker Summary of your Submission","(enter a 3 or 4 sentence summary of your overall impression of the students work here)",null,null,"Areas for improvement for entering industry","(enter up to three points of feedback for how a student can improve their work for the next deliverable submission here)"]